Regional Versus General Anesthesia in Severe Aortic Stenosis: Revisiting Hemodynamic Assumptions

Authors

  • Emine Özdemir Alaca State Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Çorum, Türkiye Author
  • Ali Can Özdemir Samsun Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Samsun, Türkiye Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65495/eurjimr.2026.17

Keywords:

aortic stenosis, general anesthesia, regional anesthesia

Abstract

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) presents significant perioperative challenges due to fixed left ventricular outflow obstruction, impaired diastolic function, and dependence on adequate preload and systemic vascular resistance. Traditional anesthetic practice has favored general anesthesia (GA) over regional anesthesia (RA) because of concerns regarding sympathetic blockade and hemodynamic instability. However, emerging evidence suggests that carefully titrated regional techniques, particularly peripheral nerve blocks, may preserve cardiovascular stability by avoiding rapid vasodilation and tachycardia associated with induction and intubation. This article revisits the physiologic basis of anesthetic management in severe AS and argues against a binary approach to technique selection. Instead, it emphasizes individualized, physiology-driven strategies tailored to procedural type and patient condition, highlighting the need for prospective studies to refine evidence-based recommendations.

References

1. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. Feb 12 2022;43(7):561-632. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395

2. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb 2 2021;77(4):e25-e197. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018

3. Chacko M, Weinberg L. Aortic valve stenosis: perioperative anaesthetic implications of surgical replacement and minimally invasive interventions. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain. 2012;12(6):295-301. doi: 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mks037

4. Shan Y, Xie K, Zhou Q, He R, Chen Z, Feng W. Sevoflurane alleviates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury via actitation of heat shock protein-70 in patients undergoing double valve replacement surgery. Am J Transl Res. 2022;14(8):5529-5540.

5. Vinclair M, Broux C, Faure P, et al. Duration of adrenal inhibition following a single dose of etomidate in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. Apr 2008;34(4):714-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0970-y

6. Teong CY, Huang CC, Sun FJ. The Haemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation at Different Time of Fentanyl Given During Induction: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Sci Rep. Jun 1 2020;10(1):8829. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65711-9

7. Walsh M, Devereaux PJ, Garg AX, et al. Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: toward an empirical definition of hypotension. Anesthesiology. Sep 2013;119(3):507-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a10e26

8. Salmasi V, Maheshwari K, Yang D, et al. Relationship between Intraoperative Hypotension, Defined by Either Reduction from Baseline or Absolute Thresholds, and Acute Kidney and Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Anesthesiology. Jan 2017;126(1):47-65. doi: 10.1097/aln.0000000000001432

9. Van Herreweghe I, De Fré O, Polus F, et al. Spinal anesthesia in patients with aortic stenosis: a research report. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2024:rapm-2023-105113. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105113

10. Camici PG, d'Amati G, Rimoldi O. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: mechanisms and functional assessment. Nat Rev Cardiol. Jan 2015;12(1):48-62. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.160

11. O'Keefe JH, Jr., Shub C, Rettke SR. Risk of noncardiac surgical procedures in patients with aortic stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc. Apr 1989;64(4):400-5. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65728-0

Published

14.04.2026

Data Availability Statement

No new data were generated or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Issue

Section

Letter to the Editor

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Özdemir E, Özdemir AC. Regional Versus General Anesthesia in Severe Aortic Stenosis: Revisiting Hemodynamic Assumptions. Eur J Innov Med Res. 2026;1(2):54-55. doi:10.65495/eurjimr.2026.17